|
Selections
from On
the Value |
Encyclical Letter Addressed by the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II To the Bishops Priests and Deacons Men and Women Religious Lay Faithful And all People of Good Will
[…] 13. In order to facilitate the spread of abortion, enormous sums of money have been invested and continue to be invested in the production of pharmaceutical products which make it possible to kill the fetus in the mother’s womb without recourse to medical assistance. On this point, scientific research itself seems to be almost exclusively preoccupied with developing products which are ever more simple and effective in suppressing life and which at the same time are capable of removing abortion from any kind of control or social responsibility.
It is frequently asserted that contraception, if made safe and available to all, is the most effective remedy against abortion. The Catholic Church is then accused of actually promoting abortion, because she obstinately continues to teach the moral unlawfulness of contraception. When looked at carefully, this objection is clearly unfounded. It may be that many people use contraception with a view to excluding the subsequent temptation of abortion. But the negative values inherent in the “contraceptive mentality”--which is very different from responsible parenthood, lived in respect for the full truth of the conjugal act--are such that they in fact strengthen this temptation when an unwanted life is conceived.
Indeed, the pro-abortion culture is especially strong precisely where the Church’s teaching on contraception is rejected. Certainly, from the moral point of view contraception and abortion are specifically different evils: the former contradicts the full truth of the sexual act as the proper expression of conjugal love, while the latter destroys the life of a human being; the former is opposed to the virtue of chastity in marriage, the latter is opposed to the virtue of justice and directly violates the divine commandment “You shall not kill”.
But despite
their differences of nature and moral gravity, contraception and abortion are
often closely connected, as fruits of the same tree. It is true that in many
cases contraception and even abortion are practised under the pressure of
real-life difficulties, which nonetheless can never exonerate from striving to
observe God’s law fully. Still, in very many other instances such practices
are rooted in a hedonistic mentality unwilling to accept responsibility in
matters of sexuality, and they imply a self-centered concept of freedom, which
regards procreation as an obstacle to personal fulfilment. The life which could
result from a sexual encounter thus becomes an enemy to be avoided at all costs,
and abortion becomes the only possible decisive response to failed
contraception.
The close
connection which exists, in mentality, between the practice of contraception and
that of abortion is becoming increasingly obvious. It is being demonstrated in
an alarming way by the development of chemical products, intrauterine devices
and vaccines which, distributed with the same ease as contraceptives, really act
as abortifacients in the very early stages of the development of the life of the
new human being.
14. The
various techniques of artificial reproduction, which would seem to be at
the service of life and which are frequently used with this intention, actually
open the door to new threats against life. Apart from the fact that they are
morally unacceptable, since they separate procreation from the fully human
context of the conjugal act,[14]
these techniques have a
high rate of failure: not just failure in relation to fertilization but with
regard to the subsequent development of the embryo, which is exposed to the risk
of death, generally within a very short space of time. Furthermore, the number
of embryos produced is often greater than that needed for implantation in the
woman’s womb, and these so-called “spare embryos” are then destroyed or
used for research which, under the pretext of scientific or medical progress, in
fact reduces human life to the level of simple “biological material” to be
freely disposed of.
Prenatal
diagnosis, which
presents no moral objections if carried out in order to identify the medical
treatment which may be needed by the child in the womb, all too often becomes an
opportunity for proposing and procuring an abortion. This is eugenic abortion,
justified in public opinion on the basis of a mentality--mistakenly held to be
consistent with the demands of “therapeutic interventions”--which accepts
life only under certain conditions and rejects it when it is affected by any
limitation, handicap or illness.
Following
this same logic, the point has been reached where the most basic care, even
nourishment, is denied to babies born with serious handicaps or illnesses. The
contemporary scene, moreover, is becoming even more alarming by reason of the
proposals, advanced here and there, to justify even infanticide,
following the same arguments used to justify the right to abortion. In this way,
we revert to a state of barbarism which one hoped had been left behind forever.
91. Today
an important part of policies which favour life is the issue of population
growth. Certainly public authorities have a responsibility to “intervene
to orient the demography of the population”.[114] But
such interventions must always take into account and respect the primary and
inalienable responsibility of married couples and families, and cannot employ
methods which fail to respect the person and fundamental human rights, beginning
with the right to life of every innocent human being.
It is therefore morally
unacceptable to encourage, let alone impose, the use of methods such as
contraception, sterilization and abortion in order to regulate births. The ways
of solving the population problem are quite different. Governments and the
various international agencies must above all strive to create economic, social,
public health and cultural conditions which will enable married couples to make
their choices about procreation in full freedom and with genuine responsibility.
They must then make efforts to ensure “greater opportunities and a fairer
distribution of wealth so that everyone can share equitably in the goods of
creation. Solutions must be sought on the global level by establishing a true economy
of communion and sharing of goods, in both the national and international
order”.[115] This is the only way to respect the
dignity of persons and families, as well as the authentic cultural patrimony of
peoples.
Service of
the Gospel of life is thus an immense and complex task. This service
increasingly appears as a valuable and fruitful area for positive cooperation
with our brothers and sisters of other Churches and ecclesial communities, in
accordance with the practical ecumenism which the Second Vatican Council
authoritatively encouraged.[116] It also appears as a
providential area for dialogue and joint efforts with the followers of other
religions and with all people of good will. No single person or group has a
monopoly on the defence and promotion of life. These are everyone’s task and
responsibility. On the eve of the Third Millennium, the challenge facing us
is an arduous one: only the concerted efforts of all those who believe in the
value of life can prevent a setback of unforeseeable consequences for
civilization.
“Your
children will be like olive shoots around your table” (Ps 128:3): the
family as the “sanctuary of life”
92. Within
the “people of life and the people for life”, the family has a decisive
responsibility. This responsibility flows from its very nature as a
community of life and love, founded upon marriage, and from its mission to
“guard, reveal and communicate love”.[117]
Here it is
a matter of God’s own love, of which parents are co-workers and as it were
interpreters when they transmit life and raise it according to his fatherly
plan.[118] This is the love that becomes selflessness,
receptiveness and gift.
Within the
family each member is accepted, respected and honoured precisely because he or
she is a person; and if any family member is in greater need, the care which he
or she receives is all the more intense and attentive.
The family
has a special role to play throughout the life of its members, from birth to
death. It is truly “the sanctuary of life: the place in which life--the
gift of God--can be properly welcomed and protected against the many attacks to
which it is exposed, and can develop in accordance with what constitutes
authentic human growth”.[119] Consequently the role of
the family in building a culture of life is decisive and irreplaceable.
As the domestic
church, the family is summoned to proclaim, celebrate and serve the Gospel
of life. This is a responsibility which first concerns married couples,
called to be givers of life, on the basis of an ever greater awareness of the
meaning of procreation as a unique event which clearly reveals that human
life is a gift received in order then to be given as a gift. In giving
origin to a new life, parents recognize that the child, “as the fruit of their
mutual gift of love, is, in turn, a gift for both of them, a gift which flows
from them”.[120]
It is above
all in raising children that the family fulfils its mission to proclaim
the Gospel of life. By word and example, in the daily round of relations
and choices, and through concrete actions and signs, parents lead their children
to authentic freedom, actualized in the sincere gift of self, and they cultivate
in them respect for others, a sense of justice, cordial openness, dialogue,
generous service, solidarity and all the other values which help people to live
life as a gift. In raising children Christian parents must be concerned about
their children’s faith and help them to fulfill the vocation God has given
them. The parents’ mission as educators also includes teaching and giving
their children an example of the true meaning of suffering and death. They will
be able to do this if they are sensitive to all kinds of suffering around them
and, even more, if they succeed in fostering attitudes of closeness, assistance
and sharing towards sick or elderly members of the family.
93. The
family celebrates the Gospel of life through daily prayer, both
individual prayer and family prayer. The family prays in order to glorify and
give thanks to God for the gift of life, and implores his light and strength in
order to face times of difficulty and suffering without losing hope. But the
celebration which gives meaning to every other form of prayer and worship is
found in the family’s actual daily life together, if it is a life of
love and self-giving.
This
celebration thus becomes a service to the Gospel of life, expressed
through solidarity as experienced within and around the family in the
form of concerned, attentive and loving care shown in the humble, ordinary
events of each day. A particularly significant expression of solidarity between
families is a willingness to adopt or take in children abandoned
by their parents or in situations of serious hardship. True parental love is
ready to go beyond the bonds of flesh and blood in order to accept children from
other families, offering them whatever is necessary for their well-being and
full development. Among the various forms of adoption, consideration should be
given to adoption-at-a-distance, preferable in cases where the only
reason for giving up the child is the extreme poverty of the child’s family.
Through this type of adoption, parents are given the help needed to support and
raise their children, without their being uprooted from their natural
environment.
Cf.
CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH, Instruction
on Respect for Human Life in its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation Donum
Vitae: AAS 80 (1988), 70-102.
Catechism of the
Catholic Church, No. 2372.
JOHN
PAUL II, Address to the Fourth General Conference of Latin American Bishops in
Santo Domingo (12 October 1992 ), No. 15: AAS 85 (1993), 819.
Cf.
Decree on Ecumenism Unitatis Redintegratio, 12; Pastoral
Constitution on the Church in the Modern World Gaudium et Spes, 90.
JOHN
PAUL II, Post-Synodal
Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris Consortio (22 November 1981), 17: AAS
74 (1982), 100.
Cf.
SECOND VATICAN ECUMENICAL COUNCIL, Pastoral
Constitution on the Church in the Modern World Gaudium et Spes, 50.
JOHN
PAUL II, Encyclical
Letter Centesimus Annus (1 May 1991), 39 AAS 83 (1991), 842.
JOHN
PAUL II, Address to Participants in the Seventh Symposium of European Bishops,
on the theme of “Contemporary Attitudes towards Life and Death: a Challenge
for Evangelization” (17 October 1989), No. 5: Insegnamenti XII, 2
(1989), 945. Children are presented in the Biblical tradition precisely as
God’s gift (cf. Ps 127:3) and as a sign of his blessing on those who
walk in his ways (cf. Ps 128 3-4).
xxxx» cont
xcxcxc